A controversial incident has emerged, involving a police and crime commissioner (PCC) and a unique photo request. The story takes an unexpected turn, raising questions about the boundaries of political campaigns and the role of public servants.
Rupert Matthews, the PCC for Leicestershire and Rutland, is facing a complaint over an email he sent to a serving police officer. The email, described as "unsolicited," requested the officer's assistance in organizing a campaign photo with a horse, referencing Vladimir Putin's iconic topless horseback photoshoot. But here's where it gets controversial: Matthews allegedly asked a police officer, a public servant, to help with his personal campaign material.
The complaint was referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing. However, the IOPC's investigation focused on allegations of "intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence" and "misconduct in public office." The spokesperson clarified that the alleged offences occurred when Matthews requested a serving officer's participation in promotional election material.
And this is the part most people miss: Matthews has a history with horses. He was elected in 2021 and re-elected in 2024, but it was only in 2025 that he defected from the Conservatives to Reform UK. His office in Leicestershire confirmed that the IOPC did not find any criminal offence and returned the matter to the police and crime panel.
A small sub-committee will now meet to discuss the complaint with Matthews. His office stated that he has met the officer concerned several times for public engagement purposes and that Matthews has a well-known fear of horses, which he mentions humorously whenever horses are involved.
So, the question remains: Was this a harmless request or a misuse of power? The Leicestershire Police have declined to comment, leaving the public to speculate. This story highlights the fine line between political campaigning and potential misconduct. It's a reminder that even seemingly innocent requests can spark controversy and debate. What are your thoughts? Do you think Matthews crossed a line, or is this a non-issue? Share your opinions in the comments!
