The Lifetime ISA (LISA) scheme, introduced in 2017, aims to assist individuals in saving for retirement or purchasing a first home up to £450,000. However, its effectiveness in London, where the average first-time buyer spends £463,000, is being questioned. The property price cap is seen as outdated, limiting the scheme's usefulness for many young Londoners. This is evident in the experiences of individuals like Fraser Glenn and Sophie Bower, who struggled to find affordable properties within the cap, ultimately leading to unauthorized withdrawals and financial penalties. Calvin Kern and Jordan Waite also share similar stories, highlighting the scheme's limitations in the expensive London market. The high number of unauthorized withdrawals compared to authorized ones further underscores the scheme's challenges. The penalty for unauthorized withdrawals, which costs savers 6.25% of their savings, is particularly burdensome in London, where young people often face financial strain. The LISA's potential to hinder rather than help young Londoners in their quest for homeownership is a significant concern. The government's response, focusing on building affordable housing and overhauling the planning system, is seen as insufficient by some experts, who advocate for reforms such as removing the penalty and raising the property price cap to align with London's housing market. The LISA's future in London remains uncertain, but the need for reform is clear to ensure it serves its intended purpose.